JAK Inhibitors: What Infections and Blood Clots to Watch For

JAK Inhibitors: What Infections and Blood Clots to Watch For

JAK Inhibitor Risk Assessment Tool

Assess Your Risk

This tool estimates your risk of serious infections and blood clots while taking JAK inhibitors based on factors discussed in the article. Your results are for educational purposes only.

Your Risk Assessment

Infection Risk Score:

0

Blood Clot Risk Score:

0
How scores are calculated: Each risk factor increases your score. Higher scores mean higher risk. This tool uses data from clinical studies referenced in the article.

When you’re managing a chronic autoimmune condition like rheumatoid arthritis or ulcerative colitis, finding a treatment that actually works can feel like a win. JAK inhibitors - drugs like tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib - have delivered real relief for many people. They work fast, often better than older biologics, and come as pills instead of injections. But behind that convenience lies a serious trade-off: a higher risk of life-threatening infections and blood clots. If you’re considering or already taking one of these drugs, you need to know what to watch for - and what your doctor should be checking.

Why JAK Inhibitors Increase Infection Risk

JAK inhibitors block signaling pathways your immune system uses to fight off germs. That’s how they reduce inflammation in diseases like psoriasis or arthritis. But they don’t pick and choose which threats to block. They weaken your body’s ability to respond to viruses, bacteria, and fungi - even ones you’ve lived with for years.

The most common serious infection tied to these drugs is herpes zoster - better known as shingles. Even if you’ve had chickenpox as a kid or got the shingles vaccine, your risk still goes up. One study found 14.2% of all infection reports with JAK inhibitors involved shingles. Some patients get it within months of starting treatment. One Reddit user described being hospitalized for five days after developing shingles despite being vaccinated.

Other dangerous infections include tuberculosis (TB), fungal infections like histoplasmosis, and bacterial pneumonia. These aren’t rare outliers - they’re documented in clinical trials and real-world reports. The FDA and EMA both warn that these drugs can reactivate latent TB. That’s why doctors are supposed to test you for TB before you start treatment. If you’ve traveled to or lived in areas where TB is common, tell your doctor. Even if you’ve never had symptoms, you could still be carrying it.

Live vaccines are a hard no while you’re on these drugs. That means no MMR, chickenpox, nasal flu spray, or yellow fever shots. Inactivated vaccines like the flu shot or pneumococcal vaccine are still okay - but they might not work as well. Get them at least four weeks before starting a JAK inhibitor. Don’t wait until you’re already on the drug to catch up.

Thrombosis: The Silent Threat

While infections grab headlines, blood clots are just as dangerous - and often sneak up without warning. JAK inhibitors raise the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). A 2022 analysis of over 126,000 patients showed JAK inhibitors increased the odds of blood clots by 2.37 times compared to other drugs. For pulmonary embolism? The risk jumped 2.81 times.

Why does this happen? It’s linked to how these drugs affect JAK2 - the same pathway that helps make platelets and regulate blood clotting. Inhibiting it doesn’t just calm inflammation; it throws off your body’s natural balance. The result? Clots can form in your legs, lungs, or even your brain.

Real stories show how sudden this can be. One patient on upadacitinib developed a clot in her calf after a long flight. Another, age 68, had a pulmonary embolism six months after starting treatment. Both had no prior history of clots. Age is a big factor: patients over 65 have nearly four times the risk. So do people with obesity (BMI over 30), a history of clots, or those on estrogen therapy. If you’ve had a clot before, JAK inhibitors are generally not recommended.

Not all JAK inhibitors are the same. Upadacitinib, which targets JAK1 more specifically, appears to carry a lower clot risk than tofacitinib, which hits multiple JAK pathways. In one trial, tofacitinib had nearly five times the VTE rate of upadacitinib in low-risk patients. But regulators still warn that all drugs in this class carry this risk - no exceptions.

Who Should Avoid JAK Inhibitors Altogether

The European Medicines Agency and FDA didn’t just slap on warnings - they changed who can get these drugs. As of 2022, JAK inhibitors are no longer first-line treatment for rheumatoid arthritis or other conditions. They’re now reserved for patients who haven’t responded to TNF inhibitors or other biologics.

You should not start a JAK inhibitor if you have:

  • Any history of blood clots in your legs, lungs, or elsewhere
  • Been diagnosed with cancer in the last five years (except non-melanoma skin cancer)
  • Are 65 or older
  • Smoke or used to smoke
  • Have heart disease, high blood pressure, or high cholesterol
  • Have a BMI over 30
  • Are on estrogen-based therapy (like birth control or hormone replacement)

Even if you don’t have all these risk factors, your doctor should still run a full assessment. Many practices now use standardized checklists before prescribing. If your doctor skips this step, ask why. You’re not being difficult - you’re being smart.

Chibi patient with a dark storm-cloud blood clot above their leg, doctor holding a risk clipboard.

Monitoring: What Your Doctor Should Be Checking

Starting a JAK inhibitor isn’t a one-time prescription. It’s an ongoing safety project. Your doctor should schedule regular tests:

  • Complete blood count (CBC) every 4 to 8 weeks - to catch low white cells, red cells, or platelets
  • Lipid panel at 4 and 12 weeks - JAK inhibitors raise LDL (“bad”) cholesterol by 10-15% and total cholesterol by up to 20%
  • Annual cancer screenings - skin checks, colonoscopies, mammograms - because risk of some cancers increases
  • Baseline D-dimer and leg ultrasound for high-risk patients - recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians

These aren’t optional. They’re part of the safety protocol. If your doctor isn’t ordering them, push back. You’re paying for more than a pill - you’re paying for vigilance.

What to Do If Something Feels Off

Don’t wait for a formal diagnosis. If you notice any of these signs, call your doctor immediately:

  • Fever, chills, or night sweats - could signal infection
  • Red, warm, swollen leg - possible deep vein thrombosis
  • Sudden shortness of breath, chest pain, or rapid heartbeat - possible pulmonary embolism
  • Painful rash or blisters on one side of your body - possible shingles
  • Unexplained fatigue, dizziness, or pale skin - possible anemia or low platelets

If you’re diagnosed with a serious infection or blood clot, your doctor will stop the JAK inhibitor right away. That’s standard. But don’t assume you can restart it later. Once you’ve had one of these events, the risk of recurrence is high. Many patients switch to TNF inhibitors or other biologics after a clot or infection.

Three chibi doctors comparing JAK inhibitor pills, one with warning sparks, another safer, scale tipping to safety.

The Bigger Picture: Risk vs. Reward

Yes, JAK inhibitors work. Many patients say they’ve gone from being unable to hold a coffee cup to playing with their grandkids. But that benefit comes with real, measurable dangers. The ORAL Surveillance trial showed a 49% higher risk of death from any cause in patients on tofacitinib compared to TNF inhibitors. That’s not a small number.

It’s not about fear. It’s about awareness. If you’re young, healthy, and have tried everything else - and your doctor has ruled out all the risk factors - then JAK inhibitors can still be a good option. But if you’re over 60, have high blood pressure, or smoke, you need to ask: Is this the best choice? Or is there another path?

The market has already responded. In 2023, only 28% of new prescriptions for biologics were JAK inhibitors - down from 35% in 2020. More doctors are choosing TNF blockers first. That’s not because they’re less effective. It’s because they’re safer.

What’s Next?

Researchers are already working on next-generation drugs with better safety profiles. JAK1-selective inhibitors like upadacitinib and filgotinib show promise. Newer agents like TYK2 inhibitors are in trials and may offer similar benefits without the clot risk. But those aren’t widely available yet.

For now, the message is clear: JAK inhibitors aren’t dangerous for everyone. But they’re dangerous for enough people that you can’t treat them like a casual prescription. Know your risks. Ask the questions. Demand the tests. Your life depends on it.

Can JAK inhibitors cause shingles even if I got the vaccine?

Yes. The shingles vaccine reduces risk but doesn’t eliminate it - especially when your immune system is suppressed by JAK inhibitors. Studies show about 1 in 7 people on these drugs still develop shingles, even if vaccinated. If you get a painful, blistering rash on one side of your body, don’t wait - contact your doctor right away.

Are all JAK inhibitors equally risky for blood clots?

No. JAK inhibitors vary in how they target different JAK proteins. Tofacitinib, which blocks JAK1 and JAK2, has shown higher rates of blood clots in trials. Upadacitinib and filgotinib are more selective for JAK1 and appear to have lower clot risk. But regulators still warn that all drugs in this class carry some risk - so no one should assume they’re completely safe.

Should I stop taking my JAK inhibitor if I’m planning surgery?

Yes. Most surgeons and rheumatologists recommend stopping JAK inhibitors at least one week before major surgery, and sometimes longer - depending on your risk of clotting or infection. Always talk to your prescribing doctor and surgeon together before scheduling any procedure. Restarting the drug after surgery also needs careful timing to avoid infection or clot complications.

How often should I get blood tests while on a JAK inhibitor?

You should have a complete blood count (CBC) every 4 to 8 weeks, especially in the first 6 months. After that, if your numbers stay stable, your doctor may extend it to every 3 months. Lipid levels should be checked at 4 and 12 weeks after starting, then annually. Skipping these tests means you’re flying blind - and you could miss early signs of infection, anemia, or high cholesterol.

Is it safe to take JAK inhibitors if I’ve had cancer before?

Generally, no. The FDA and EMA warn against using JAK inhibitors in patients with a history of cancer within the last five years (except non-melanoma skin cancer). These drugs can interfere with your body’s ability to detect and destroy abnormal cells. If your cancer was treated more than five years ago and you’re in full remission, your doctor might consider it - but only after a thorough review and with close monitoring.

Final Thoughts

JAK inhibitors aren’t the enemy. For many, they’re life-changing. But they’re not a magic bullet. They come with real, documented risks that demand attention - not avoidance, but awareness. If you’re on one, make sure you’re being monitored. If you’re thinking about starting one, make sure you’ve explored all other options. And never assume your doctor knows everything - ask the tough questions. Your health is worth it.

9 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Ted Carr

    November 2, 2025 AT 01:35

    So let me get this straight: we’ve traded the convenience of a pill for a 2.8x higher chance of dying from a blood clot, and the FDA’s response is to slap on a warning and call it a day? Brilliant. Just brilliant. Next they’ll market a chainsaw that comes with a ‘please don’t cut your arm off’ sticker.

  • Image placeholder

    Rebecca Parkos

    November 2, 2025 AT 15:51

    I had to stop my JAK inhibitor after shingles landed me in the ER. I got the vaccine. I did everything right. And still, it happened. I’m not mad at my doctor-I’m mad at the system that lets these drugs be pushed so hard without enough real-world safety data. If you’re on one, don’t wait for symptoms. Get your blood work done. Every. Single. Time. Your life isn’t a gamble.

  • Image placeholder

    Bradley Mulliner

    November 3, 2025 AT 13:09

    People who take these drugs are essentially volunteering for a medical lottery where the prize is a pulmonary embolism. The fact that they’re still prescribed to smokers over 65 with high cholesterol is a moral failure. No one’s forcing you to take them. You chose this. Now stop acting surprised when your body rebels.

  • Image placeholder

    Rahul hossain

    November 5, 2025 AT 10:04

    In India, we have a saying: ‘A man who drinks poison to cure hunger will die twice.’ JAK inhibitors are that poison-sweet-talking, pill-shaped, and wrapped in marketing jargon about ‘life-changing relief.’ But when your immune system is a silent, smoldering ruin, and your lungs are full of clots, no grandkid will thank you for the coffee cup you could finally hold.

  • Image placeholder

    Reginald Maarten

    November 5, 2025 AT 14:46

    Correction: The ORAL Surveillance trial showed a 49% higher risk of death from any cause in patients on tofacitinib compared to TNF inhibitors-not ‘nearly 50%’ as some sources misstate. Also, the EMA’s 2022 restriction applies only to rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis-not all autoimmune conditions. And while upadacitinib has lower VTE rates, the hazard ratio for PE remains statistically significant. Precision matters. Misinformation kills.

  • Image placeholder

    Jonathan Debo

    November 7, 2025 AT 11:30

    Let’s be clear: If you’re taking a JAK inhibitor and you’re not getting a CBC every 4 weeks, a lipid panel at 4 and 12 weeks, AND a baseline D-dimer if you’re over 60 or obese-you’re not being treated. You’re being experimented on. And if your doctor doesn’t know this, they shouldn’t be writing prescriptions. I’ve seen too many patients ignored because ‘they looked fine.’ Look fine? Look fine doesn’t mean your platelets aren’t plummeting or your LDL is climbing like a stock market bubble.

  • Image placeholder

    Robin Annison

    November 9, 2025 AT 08:05

    It’s strange how we treat medical innovation like a magic wand-wave it, and pain disappears. But we forget that every molecule has a shadow. JAK inhibitors don’t just calm inflammation-they silence the body’s alarms. Maybe the real question isn’t whether they work, but whether we’ve lost the patience to wait for safer solutions. Sometimes healing isn’t fast. Sometimes it’s quiet. And sometimes, it’s not a pill at all.

  • Image placeholder

    Abigail Jubb

    November 10, 2025 AT 05:48

    I cried for three days after my pulmonary embolism. Not because I was scared-I was terrified. I was 52, ran 5Ks, ate kale. I didn’t smoke. I didn’t even have a family history. And yet, six months after starting upadacitinib, I was in the ER with a clot in my lung. My doctor said, ‘It’s rare.’ But it happened to me. And now I’m on warfarin. Forever. So if you’re thinking about this drug… don’t. Just… don’t.

  • Image placeholder

    George Clark-Roden

    November 10, 2025 AT 16:47

    My wife took tofacitinib for 18 months. She went from wheelchair to gardening. Then, out of nowhere-shingles. Then, pneumonia. Then, a 30-point spike in LDL. We didn’t know any of this was coming. The doctor said, ‘It’s rare.’ But rare doesn’t mean ‘won’t happen to you.’ It means ‘happens to someone else.’ And now, she’s on a TNF blocker. No more pills. No more surprises. Just needles. And peace of mind. I’d take the needle any day.

Write a comment